Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fieldname"

From WolfWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(use of color...bad!)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
That was just my suggestion. Maybe this differs from banis view of beautification :) --Deus 04:46, 13 November 2005 (PST)
 
That was just my suggestion. Maybe this differs from banis view of beautification :) --Deus 04:46, 13 November 2005 (PST)
 +
 +
== use of color...bad! ==
 +
 +
use of color to convey specific data (ro/rw) is bad. red/green is the worst possible choice too :)<br>
 +
consider someone who is colorblind. check the article via http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ to see how bad this is.
 +
but it looks bad even for those who aren't color blind :P

Revision as of 13:40, 14 November 2005

someone feel free to make this table pretty.

Roger that. --Rookie One 03:31, 13 November 2005 (PST)

// Comment by Deus 13:22, 13 November 2005 (CET) I liked the former one more. I thought about some colorisation like red for readonly and green for r/w. maybe some mouseover stuff, or just the one tr light the next darker, to have a better viewability ? // End of Deus Comment

Alright, I'll restore the previous borders and add some colour. --Rookie One 04:33, 13 November 2005 (PST)

That was just my suggestion. Maybe this differs from banis view of beautification :) --Deus 04:46, 13 November 2005 (PST)

use of color...bad!

use of color to convey specific data (ro/rw) is bad. red/green is the worst possible choice too :)
consider someone who is colorblind. check the article via http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ to see how bad this is. but it looks bad even for those who aren't color blind :P