Talk:Lua Mod API - Revision history

Hadr0 at 21:34, 9 November 2007

2007-11-09T21:34:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 9 November 2007
Line 86:		Line 86:
	http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-alpha/dns.html		http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-alpha/dns.html
	(static compile if loadlib isnt gonna happen plx) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)		(static compile if loadlib isnt gonna happen plx) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)
			:hmm been thinking about the hostname from the socket request.. this may not a practical as a hostname lookup can take several tenth of a second.. so there may be too much lag when a player connects.. since et is single-threaded and has to wait for the call to complete (?) Still, bit-support would come in handy for a variety of purposes. [[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 13:34, 9 November 2007 (PST)

	== et_ClientSpawn + intermission ==		== et_ClientSpawn + intermission ==

Hadr0 at 10:50, 10 October 2007

2007-10-10T10:50:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 10 October 2007
Line 94:		Line 94:
	== b_anticheat ==		== b_anticheat ==
	maybe a wild idea but hows about a callback function if a cheater is spotted via the etpro anticheat system? cos i dont want to kick 'em for 99999 seconds (on average our server is rebooted once per week) so i'd like to intercept the call with lua and do a proper ban. (+perhaps axx to the arrays where kicks are held, or is that engine stuff?) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:56, 9 October 2007 (PDT)		maybe a wild idea but hows about a callback function if a cheater is spotted via the etpro anticheat system? cos i dont want to kick 'em for 99999 seconds (on average our server is rebooted once per week) so i'd like to intercept the call with lua and do a proper ban. (+perhaps axx to the arrays where kicks are held, or is that engine stuff?) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:56, 9 October 2007 (PDT)

			== bug? ==
			et.trap_DropClient doesn't trigger the lua's own et_ClientDisconnect(). its not a big deal as its possible to call that function explicitly before dropping, and it does trigger other lua's disconnect-event. PB-drops for example DO trigger the disconnect event. So i was wondering if this was intentional? (i dont think earlier versions had it) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 03:50, 10 October 2007 (PDT)

Pdi at 10:43, 10 October 2007

2007-10-10T10:43:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 10 October 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Or can someone explain how spam protection is calculated by etpro mod? Any source code example please!? So I can reproduce it in LUA! THX! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:34, 17 May 2007 (PDT)		:Or can someone explain how spam protection is calculated by etpro mod? Any source code example please!? So I can reproduce it in LUA! THX! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:34, 17 May 2007 (PDT)
	::Try loading my 'client command filter' before your mod -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:04, 8 October 2007 (PDT)		::Try loading my 'client command filter' before your mod -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:04, 8 October 2007 (PDT)
			:::Sorry. I wrote my own function but it isn't really the same. I need an copy of the original code segment or the '''isspam''' flag! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 03:43, 10 October 2007 (PDT)
	----		----

Hadr0 at 12:56, 9 October 2007

2007-10-09T12:56:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 9 October 2007
Line 92:		Line 92:

	== b_anticheat ==		== b_anticheat ==
	maybe a wild idea but hows about a callback function if a cheater is spotted via the etpro anticheat system? cos i dont want to kick 'em for 99999 seconds (on average our server is rebooted once per week) so i'd like to intercept the call with lua and do a proper ban. -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 04:25, 9 October 2007 (PDT)		maybe a wild idea but hows about a callback function if a cheater is spotted via the etpro anticheat system? cos i dont want to kick 'em for 99999 seconds (on average our server is rebooted once per week) so i'd like to intercept the call with lua and do a proper ban. (+perhaps axx to the arrays where kicks are held, or is that engine stuff?) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:56, 9 October 2007 (PDT)

Hadr0 at 11:25, 9 October 2007

2007-10-09T11:25:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 9 October 2007
Line 90:		Line 90:
	Hell why not add a trigger-intermission event? its so messy to monitor the gamestate-cvar within the runframe-event. and i just don't trust et_print().. players can change their name/inject BS into that function at will. Thank you!!</p>		Hell why not add a trigger-intermission event? its so messy to monitor the gamestate-cvar within the runframe-event. and i just don't trust et_print().. players can change their name/inject BS into that function at will. Thank you!!</p>
	-[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 06:46, 8 October 2007 (PDT)		-[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 06:46, 8 October 2007 (PDT)

			== b_anticheat ==
			maybe a wild idea but hows about a callback function if a cheater is spotted via the etpro anticheat system? cos i dont want to kick 'em for 99999 seconds (on average our server is rebooted once per week) so i'd like to intercept the call with lua and do a proper ban. -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 04:25, 9 October 2007 (PDT)

Hadr0 at 13:46, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T13:46:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 8 October 2007
Line 87:		Line 87:

	== et_ClientSpawn + intermission ==		== et_ClientSpawn + intermission ==
	Instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned) ~~-[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)~~		<p>Instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned)</p><p>
	Hell why not add a trigger-intermission event? its so messy to monitor the gamestate-cvar within the runframe-event. and i just don't trust et_print().. players can change their name/inject BS into that function at will. Thank you!!		Hell why not add a trigger-intermission event? its so messy to monitor the gamestate-cvar within the runframe-event. and i just don't trust et_print().. players can change their name/inject BS into that function at will. Thank you!!</p>
			-[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 06:46, 8 October 2007 (PDT)

Hadr0 at 13:42, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T13:42:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:42, 8 October 2007
Line 86:		Line 86:
	(static compile if loadlib isnt gonna happen plx) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)		(static compile if loadlib isnt gonna happen plx) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)

	== et_ClientSpawn ==		== et_ClientSpawn + intermission ==
	~~instead~~ of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)		Instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)
			Hell why not add a trigger-intermission event? its so messy to monitor the gamestate-cvar within the runframe-event. and i just don't trust et_print().. players can change their name/inject BS into that function at will. Thank you!!

Hadr0 at 12:16, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T12:16:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 8 October 2007
Line 84:		Line 84:
	HI i'd like LuaBit and LuaSocket support so we can enhance ET banishments: http://lua-users.org/wiki/BitwiseOperators		HI i'd like LuaBit and LuaSocket support so we can enhance ET banishments: http://lua-users.org/wiki/BitwiseOperators
	http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-alpha/dns.html		http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-alpha/dns.html
			(static compile if loadlib isnt gonna happen plx) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)

	== et_ClientSpawn ==		== et_ClientSpawn ==
	instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned)		instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned) -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:16, 8 October 2007 (PDT)

Hadr0 at 12:04, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T12:04:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 8 October 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Please add a third var to et_ClientCommand() function: et_ClientCommand(clientnum, command, '''isspam''') - '''isspam''' indicates if the client command is ignored by spam filter limit (1) or not (0). Thx!! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:01, 13 May 2007 (PDT)		Please add a third var to et_ClientCommand() function: et_ClientCommand(clientnum, command, '''isspam''') - '''isspam''' indicates if the client command is ignored by spam filter limit (1) or not (0). Thx!! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:01, 13 May 2007 (PDT)
	:Or can someone explain how spam protection is calculated by etpro mod? Any source code example please!? So I can reproduce it in LUA! THX! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:34, 17 May 2007 (PDT)		:Or can someone explain how spam protection is calculated by etpro mod? Any source code example please!? So I can reproduce it in LUA! THX! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:34, 17 May 2007 (PDT)
			::Try loading my 'client command filter' before your mod -[[User:Hadr0\|Hadr0]] 05:04, 8 October 2007 (PDT)
	----		----

Line 79:		Line 79:

	:No, et_ClientSay is a function you would define yourself to filter or do something with chats. It was it's own callback in earlier version of the API. -[[User:ReyalP\|ReyalP]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (PST)		:No, et_ClientSay is a function you would define yourself to filter or do something with chats. It was it's own callback in earlier version of the API. -[[User:ReyalP\|ReyalP]] 17:19, 24 February 2007 (PST)

			== additional libs ==

			HI i'd like LuaBit and LuaSocket support so we can enhance ET banishments: http://lua-users.org/wiki/BitwiseOperators
			http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/old/luasocket-2.0-alpha/dns.html

			== et_ClientSpawn ==
			instead of using the vulnerable et_Print(text) to find the medic, i'd like et_ClientSpawn(clientNum,the_guy_who_gave_the_vive_or_-1_if_spawned)

Pdi: ^^ asking 4 source code example of client command spam filter

2007-05-17T12:34:47Z

^^ asking 4 source code example of client command spam filter

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:34, 17 May 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Please add a third var to et_ClientCommand() function: et_ClientCommand(clientnum, command, '''isspam''') - '''isspam''' indicates if the client command is ignored by spam filter limit (1) or not (0). Thx!! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:01, 13 May 2007 (PDT)		Please add a third var to et_ClientCommand() function: et_ClientCommand(clientnum, command, '''isspam''') - '''isspam''' indicates if the client command is ignored by spam filter limit (1) or not (0). Thx!! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:01, 13 May 2007 (PDT)
	:Or ~~simple bypass the lua hook if~~ it~~'s ignored by spam filter. Thx~~! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 03:44, 14 May 2007 (PDT)		:Or can someone explain how spam protection is calculated by etpro mod? Any source code example please!? So I can reproduce it in LUA! THX! --[[User:Pdi\|pdi]] 05:34, 17 May 2007 (PDT)

	----		----